They optimized for LLMs, not just Google.

FAQs. Comparison pages. Transparent pricing. LinkedIn presence. These aren't vanity plays. They're what gets you cited in ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude when your buyers are researching, your investors are looking, and your future hires are deciding where to work.

Download the free AEO Playbook for Startups from HubSpot and get the exact checklist. Five minutes to read.

Unlock the playbook

There's a version of fundraising that looks like work but isn't.

A founder opens a spreadsheet. They Google "seed stage investors in [their space]." They find 50 names. They draft a cold email, change the investor's name at the top, and send it 50 times. Then they wait. Then they wonder why nobody responds.

That's not a fundraising strategy. That's a list of names with no intelligence behind it. And the investors on the receiving end of those emails know immediately that's what it is.

I've talked to over 100 investors. One of the things they mention most consistently — unprompted — is how easy it is to tell when a founder hasn't done any real targeting work before reaching out. It comes through in the email, in the first conversation, and in the pitch itself. The founders who raise efficiently are the ones who treat the investor list not as an administrative task but as a strategic document. It's the foundation of the entire process.

Here's the four-step framework I walk every founder through.

Before you put a single name on your list, you need to understand what each investor actually funds. Not in a vague, general sense — specifically. Stage. Sector. Check size. Geography. Investment thesis.

Most investor websites have this information if you read carefully. Their portfolio tells you even more. If an investor writes $50K angel checks into consumer apps and you're raising a $2M seed round for a B2B enterprise platform — they don't belong on your list. It doesn't matter how well-known they are. It doesn't matter if you admire their track record. Sending a pitch to an investor who doesn't fund your stage, sector, or check size isn't networking. It's noise.

The goal of thesis matching isn't to find investors who might be interested. It's to find investors for whom your company is exactly what they're looking for. That's a much shorter list — and a much more powerful one.

Once you've identified investors whose stated thesis matches what you're building, go one level deeper: look at who they've actually backed.

This matters for two reasons. First, if an investor already has two or three companies doing something very close to what you're doing, they may be conflicted — or they may have a strong opinion about why the space isn't working. Either way, you need to know that before you pitch them. Second, if an investor has never backed a company in your space, you're going to spend half the meeting educating them on the market dynamics. That's not always fatal, but it slows everything down and puts you in the position of advocate rather than founder.

The sweet spot is an investor who understands your space — who has pattern-matched on it, who has opinions about it, who maybe has adjacent portfolio companies — but who hasn't already made their primary bet. That investor is primed. They've been watching the space. They have context. And if you can show them why your approach is the one that wins, you're pushing on an already-open door.

Steps 3 and 4 are where most founders leave the most ground on the table — how to read activity signals so you're only pitching investors who are actively writing checks right now, and the warm path framework that is the only outreach approach that consistently works at seed stage. This section is for Inside Access members.

A great investor who isn't actively deploying right now isn't a great target. Reputation means nothing if the checkbook is closed.

Here's what to look at. When was their last announced deal? Check Crunchbase, LinkedIn, their own newsletter if they have one. If the most recent investment you can find is 18 months ago, ask yourself why. Did they just close a new fund and are ramping back up? Did they close their fund two years ago and have limited dry powder left? Are they going through a portfolio triage period after some struggles?

Fund cycle matters more than most founders realize. A seed fund typically deploys over three to four years. If you can figure out roughly when they closed their current fund and how many investments they've made from it, you can estimate where they are in the cycle. Investors in the first half of their deployment window are your best targets. They have capital, they have mandate, and they have incentive to build the portfolio.

LinkedIn activity is also a signal. Investors who are actively posting, commenting, and engaging with the founder community are in "deal flow mode." The ones who've gone quiet are often heads down managing their existing portfolio and not looking for new deals.

This is the step that separates founders who get meetings from founders who get silence.

For every investor on your final list, your job is not to figure out how to send them a cold email. Your job is to find a second-degree connection — someone who knows both of you, who can put your name in front of that investor before your pitch ever arrives. Someone who says "you should talk to this founder" before you've sent a single message.

That warm introduction doesn't just get you a meeting. It changes the entire dynamic of the meeting. As Craig Cummings at Moonshots Capital told me — FOMO powers decisions. When an investor hears about you from three people they trust, something shifts. You're no longer a cold application. You're a founder their network is excited about. That's a fundamentally different conversation.

How do you find the warm path? Start with your portfolio research from Step 2. Identify founders who have been backed by the investors on your list. Reach out to those founders — not to ask for a referral immediately, but to build a genuine connection. Ask about their experience, share what you're building, see if there's a real fit. The referral comes naturally when the relationship is real.

Also look at your advisors, angels, and early supporters. Who do they know? Who have they co-invested with? Who do they have standing with in the investor community? A single warm introduction from a trusted advisor is worth more than 50 cold emails. Map it before you send anything.

When you've done all four steps, you don't have a list anymore. You have a raise strategy.

You know which investors are the right thesis fit. You know which ones have portfolio context in your space. You know which ones are actively deploying. And you know the warm path to each of them. Now you sequence — who do you approach first, in what order, through which relationships?

The founders who close rounds in 60 to 90 days approach this like a sales pipeline. They know exactly who they're targeting, in what order, through what channel, and what the next step is after every conversation. The founders who are still pitching 12 months later are the ones who built a list of names and hoped for the best.

Which one are you building right now?

Reply and tell me: how many investors are on your current list, and how many of them do you have a warm path to? I read every response.

🎙️ Chris

Check out the podcast on Apple Podcast | Spotify | YouTube

If you want to know exactly where you stand with investors before your next pitch — book a free 30-minute Fundability Review. I'll look at your score, tell you your biggest gap, and show you what closing it looks like. Book here →